|
Tracking Prescription Drugs
When we are ill and seek medical treatment from our doctors, many of us have received free samples of prescription drugs along with a prescription for that drug. The reason behind this benevolence is that pharmaceutical companies desire to increase sales, promote the dispensing of free trials through this form of distribution that ultimately results in stimulating prescriptions for that drug. The doctor then receives more free samples and the cycle has begun. The more scripts, the more samples, and the more samples the greater the revenue for the drug company. This is the very heart of growth for ethical drugs. Demand creates profits and funds new research. The more demand the better. This perceived value makes for inflated stock prices and so the story goes.
At times, pharmaceutical sales personnel may not accurately account for the drugs
distributed and these drugs may get into the market or distributed by unauthorized
sources. There are at least 50 popular street scams to collect drugs to supply
the black and gray markets. The amount of money to be made is enormous based
on the costs of today?s prescription medications. With demand created, unscrupulous
doctors, pharmacies, hospitals and care centers are the best conduit for this
elicit activity.
The FBI has been monitoring this form of medical fraud for many years. Operation
Gold Pill from 1992 was the kick off for exposure of this problem. By identifying
outlets, sources and distribution of ethical drugs the FBI, FDA and other governmental
service agencies identified just how big this problem really was. It has just
gotten worse over the years. For every conviction there are new dealers and increased
demand. When this happens at the national and international level, the potential
for disaster is eminent. The liability associated with the wrongful deaths, injury
or poisoning of a person reflects directly back to the manufacturer regardless
of the source of the drug. Stolen drugs are sold as piggybacks to legally distributed
drugs and blended by pharmacies and dealers to hide the activity. The blending
of counterfeit drugs along with original drugs is an additional concern. In the
past, most free samples had not been diligently accounted for. Records were incomplete
and the distribution activity was fertile ground for abuse, theft and deception.
These abuses were the basis for the FDA enacting the PDMA ruling which took
effect 12/4/00.
PDMA is an acronym for Prescription Drug. The FDA and congress have determined that the public interest can only be served by passing legislation to assure that none of these products invade the market. Needless to say this is an ambitious task. Unauthorized channels for distribution of ethical drugs begin at the street level in units as small as a few pills. It also encompasses cargo theft of drugs, robberies of pharmacies, hospitals and nursing homes to mention a few sources. Certain targeted products, such as those household known names like Viagra, Valium and Prozac are in high demand on the black market for street sale. Less known drugs for dermatological conditions, cancer, insulin, Aids and pain management are also in high demand through the standard channels of distribution. Demand creates the need and the ready supply of products fills the void.
Dispensed inappropriately drugs can do a considerable amount of harm to users and immeasurable harm to the manufacturers and intellectual property holders. A bad name in the press, an associated death or other impropriety can make stock prices tumble thereby becoming the death knell for companies unaware of this threat. Just remember back to the Tylenol fiasco. That incident was the basis for significant legislation and it was additionally the catalyst for the birth of tamper evident packaging.
Pharmaceutical sales personnel know the value of the commodity they distribute. They are really misnamed in being called salesmen and women, because they offer products free of charge to physicians. Their limited expertise in the drug is useful in establishing a market but, like the Easter bunny, they hop around to the 1 million US physicians and hospitals and drop off their products. At times they may be prone to dispense ?just a few? to their friends or sell some to get extra revenue. This condition is almost impossible to monitor in many companies given the magnitude of the sales force, the products they distribute and the doctors or nurse practitioners that receive these goods.
Sample drugs are distributed from warehouses and they are often times not uniquely
packages. They are delivered in mass to sales personnel and CSO's (third party
fulfillment companies) typically shipped products to their homes or warehouses.
These products are also distributed through logistic providers who store them
for the drug company's field sales force. The salesman who lives in a condo surely
cannot place a pallet of drugs in his living room, so he often times stores them
in an off site and unattended facility. These facilities can be anything from
a roadside storage room to a secure public warehouse. Regardless of the facility
the drugs are typically prescription ethical drugs that require dispensing by
a qualified physician. They are most often times expensive, name brand items
that have significant advertising behind them and considerable brand identity.
The products are typically time sensitive and need to be distributed on a preset
schedule in order to be acceptable to the manufacturer and to maintain the ethical
value of the product. The sales personnel have defined routes and medical clients;
speed and coverage are the order of the day. The drugs are most often moved in
an unsecured company car or van through the streets of every city. Some places
are obviously safer than others! Drug sales personnel and their cars are easy
to identify. They are dressed in suits and dresses and they visit doctor's offices
regularly with their products in hand. They are easy prey for thieves but they
also have the propensity to become white collar thieves themselves.
When these pallets are shipped to salesmen, accountability requirements begin
under PDMA regulations. The manufacturer now has cradle to grave responsibility
for the products. Failure to comply is met with significant sanctions and recurring
fines in the millions of dollars. Once identified as an offender, pharmaceutical
companies become vulnerable for spot audits and site inspections by both the
FDA and FBI to explore abuses under the PDMA laws. The problem of who receives
the drugs, who accounts for products given as samples and the status of this
lose inventory, is the essence of compliance mandated by the new laws. Products
are moving in and out daily from warehouses to salesmen and from salesmen to
doctors. The job of the compliance officer at drug companies has just grown from
a logistic function to a nightmare of paperwork, record keeping and logistic
protocols unknown to that element of most drug companies.
It goes without saying that security must be made a part of the design of this
type of monitoring system. No one can be a master at all facets of this law based
on the lack of specific interpretation of its components, but to test the waters
can cost millions. Security departs now find themselves immersed in learning
logistics. Traffic and warehouse personnel have been tasked with getting these
drugs into the hands of their sales personnel on a timely and repetitive basis
but they lack the expertise of security packaging and chain of custody accountability.
Blending compliance for PDMA with security packaging and protocols for distribution
is a formidable task.
Training and sharing of information pertaining to the most appropriate way to
handle this problem is the key to avoiding penalties. By staying ahead of the
curve and addressing these problems before compliance is mandated is essential.
By looking at the problems in a unified manner drug companies have established
a counsel for sharing information and defining the issues so that there is uniformity
in dealing with the problem. With uniformity comes acceptance and the hopes that
FDA will embrace planned GMP's and use them as the basis of enforcement for distribution
regulations. New problems and changing corporate culture demand today's security
professional wears many hats.
Las Vegas was the host city for the PDMA sharing conference, where over 60 of
the world's largest suppliers and manufacturers of prescription drugs met to
determine just how to comply with these issues. There were conspicuously few
security personnel and no logistic personnel present. The PDMA meeting was the
unprecedented mechanism that competitive pharmaceutical manufacturers could get
together to discuss issues without it being considered illegal! The conference
theoretically was designed to allow security, logistic and regulatory groups
within these companies to outline their unique roles in dealing with compliance
issues. By sharing their internal procedures with one another they were supposed
to come away with the how to of compliance. All this was to be done without any
fear of reprisals by the IRS or FDA. I came away from the meeting with a sense
that the participants were now more scared than ever but still not having the
tools (in a unified or any sense) to move ahead. The dynamic diverse procedures,
unique manufacturing idiosyncrasies of each company, multiplicity of monitor
able sites, packaging plants, segregation of drugs for distribution, shipping
and receiving paperwork and documentation makes this a real challenge for the
fourth quarter of 2000.
How best to define security's role but crucial. Without their focused input vulnerabilities
will not be clearly identified. Logistic personnel are far too removed from the
threats against corporate profits but rather they focus on getting goods in and
out of their respective companies. They rarely deal with losses unless they produce
paperwork for claims or surveyors. They are quick to choose carriers but rarely
certify their tariffs to examine their fleets or procedures for dealing with
problems. Because security personnel are not logistic experts they too need to
be brought up to speed on the real working of a loading dock and the requirements
to move products safely, quickly, securely and at a cost effective price. The
synergy needed for this ambidextrous task is formidable and one not easily mastered.
Corporate culture has long separated functions and now when they are most necessary
to interface each has a different place in the organization.
The PDMA conference is therefore a most critical meeting.
|